PDA

View Full Version : Surfers switch off TV for PC's


Matthew
15-01-04, 03:26 AM
Surfers switch off TV for PC's

Surfers now spend more time online than watching TV
**
Web users are swapping Gardener's World for Google and Coronation Street for Friends Reunited, according to research that shows the amount of time they spend on the internet is outstripping the time they spend watching television for the first time.

The results of the NOP survey, which shows web users now spend more time surfing the internet than they do watching television, will make grim reading for TV advertising sales chiefs pondering the decline of the medium.

On average, internet users spend three and a half hours a day on the internet compared with 2.8 hours a day watching television.

The research, which is the first to suggest the internet has overtaken the television as the most popular medium among people who have both, will provide further grist to the mill of those who argue the web will eventually spell the end of linear television.

The survey also showed 44% of those surveyed believed the internet rather than TV provided better news and entertainment than television, despite the relative youth of the web as a medium.

"The results of this survey demonstrate to what extent the internet has developed in a relatively short period of time," said Duncan Ingram, the managing director of BT Openworld, which commissioned the survey.

"Given the breadth of information the net holds, it's little surprise that users are flocking to the PC as their prime source of information... when you're online the possibilities are endless," he added.

The results chime with predictions within the TV industry. At a recent conference, broadcasting executives forecast traditional TV schedules would be usurped by the growth of broadband and interactive technology and switch off adverts altogether.

Already, Sky and the BBC are investing heavily in broadband technology to ensure they can cope with the expected changes to the broadcasting ecology.

The BBC's website is the most visited in Europe and features an increasing amount of video content, while BSkyB has launched both news and sport subscriber-only broadband portals on the web.

Last week the BBC director of new media, Ashley Highfield, unveiled plans for a BBC branded interactive media player that will sit on users' desktops and allow them to tap into any BBC programme from the past 14 days.

And the corporation's director general, Greg Dyke, has announced parallel plans for an online programme archive that would contain thousands of hours of old BBC shows.

The new statistics will also put further pressure on online sales operations to convince advertisers they should devote more of their marketing budgets to new media. At present the web takes just 1% of the £116bn spent annually on advertising in the UK, placing it well behind radio, newspapers, magazines and television.

Source. (http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcast/story/0,7493,1062261,00.html)

Interesting - I have to admit I read more News on the Internet than I watch the majority of the time, on the TV.

What about the NFHiB Forum in particular, does that make you have more or less time for TV? :D

hollygolightly
15-01-04, 10:14 AM
What about the NFHiB Forum in particular, does that make you have more or less time for TV?

Less.

I end up taping loads of stuff that I want to watch and then can never find the time to watch it :angry: :lol: .

Klaxon man
15-01-04, 10:42 AM
Very interesting topic!

Yes, I probably spend more time than i should on the internet - but it is the annoying adverts that plague the TV that push me here!

They make me feel so brain dead http://smilies.crowd9.com/contrib/blackeye/small3dblackeye.gif

Honest!

KM

Blue Cow
15-01-04, 03:04 PM
More I'm afraid :( (although I'm not really paying attention to it) as I tend to have the TV on whilst I'm on the forum.

It's a really bad habit that I've got into :(

sapphirelily10
15-01-04, 03:08 PM
I spend far more time on this forum moderating, than anything else, and in general a lot of time on the net. when I'm not doing that, I balance it up by mixing with real people!! lol I have never watched vast amounts of TV, but I bet I watch about 2 hours a week maximum of TV! ;)


Sapph ;)

Matthew
15-01-04, 03:11 PM
I have certain programmes I will specifically watch or tape and watch later, but I also spend more time here than watching TV. :D

Beth
15-01-04, 03:12 PM
I watch more telly at work than at home because I am normally here!!

we do not have internet at work :(

vanner
15-01-04, 06:52 PM
I mainly watch films and just a few Tv Progs, so yes I spend way more time
on this than watching ********pie 'soaps' !! :rolleyes:

mazza
15-01-04, 09:03 PM
Oooo now, I have been forced to think about this now that you mention it and it's true - def spending more time on the PC these days!!!

I actually find most things on the TV quite boring during the evenings (peak time) so gravitate towards the computer, but tend to go back to the TV at 9 - 10 pm ish for a bit, then back here until I conk out :lol: :blush: .

Mistyeyeddreamer
15-01-04, 09:32 PM
Since I got unlimited access I've been an addict :o I still watch a couple of the soaps and a few things like Horizon and timewatch, the occasional film, but most of my time is spent online.

I've got a few regular sites I go to and I usually visit them more than once a day. Also listen to a couple of American radio progs online.

Misty

tristar
17-01-04, 11:14 AM
I tend to have the TV on at the same time as the PC. The boys watch the TV whilst I am on here and whenever I look at it, there's usually 'Nick' on.

But I must admit that I tend to have the TV on most of the time when I am in, even if it is muted. I think it's a security thing. I even put the TV on timer in my bedroom, so that it switches off when I'm asleep.

So I don't really watch it much...unless Tenders is on :lol: I'm an avid fan of that :lol:

Sad person that I am :lol: :hihi: :lol:

TooManyMoves
18-01-04, 12:48 AM
Good topic article Matthew !

I definitely have changed since I got on the net. I rarely watch television anymore. Sometimes I try to watch the public television station (PBS in the States)
but it is often filled with background music at a level that interferes with hearing the dialogue. I've always found it a bit disrespectful to add music over someone talking. This phenomenon is also becoming more common with the news hour too. It's like they are equating it with entertainment when music is added.

Chris

Matthew
21-01-04, 01:13 AM
Originally posted by TooManyMoves@Jan 17 2004, 11:47 PM
Sometimes I try to watch the public television station (PBS in the States)
Is that like the 'terrestrial' channels we get in the UK? :D

Like the 'free', albeit for the TV Licence fee :rolleyes:, channels like BBC1, 2, ITV, Ch. 4/5, etc.

Mistyeyeddreamer
21-01-04, 02:17 PM
This phenomenon is also becoming more common with the news hour too. It's like they are equating it with entertainment when music is added.


I've noticed it on Channel 5 news over here. It is an annoying piece of music, played over and over in the background when they are reading the headlines and sometimes during a story. Grrr, drives me mad.

Misty

rockbank
21-01-04, 03:34 PM
I tend to watch documentaries or stuff like Time Team, Demolition Crew, . Property Ladder is ok but only cos' Sarah Beeney's in it playing for the crowd.

I watch Star Trek Enterprise if possible. I prefer to get the news off the internet so I can find the news I'm interested in.

Saturday nights are just a dead zone. Lowest common denominator TV.

The adverts I hate especially those cheap euro ones that can be dubbed into any language. The car ones are easy to spot as they'll have a registration that can be reversed to turn the car from right hand rive to left hand drive.

However bad things may be here though, spare a thought for the americans. Those who've suffered their TV will know what I mean. Advert break after advert break. No wonder so many of them are going to cable like HBO.

For all its faults I still think the BBC is the best value TV and radio on the planet. We're very fortunate to have it.

Annabel
21-01-04, 08:11 PM
I think the BBC is excellent on nearly all levels and their website is my most favourite. An oasis of quality in a desert of dross IMO!

I am getting into Radio 4 and think its great!

Matthew
21-01-04, 08:44 PM
Originally posted by rockbank@Jan 21 2004, 2:33 PM
I watch Star Trek Enterprise if possible.
Ahhh, quite right, quite right too. :D :thumbs:

TooManyMoves
22-01-04, 03:58 AM
Originally posted by Matthew@Jan 20 2004, 7:12 PM
Is that like the 'terrestrial' channels we get in the UK? :D

Like the 'free', albeit for the TV Licence fee :rolleyes:, channels like BBC1, 2, ITV, Ch. 4/5, etc.
First, congratulations on your 5,000th post Matthew !

PBS is the educational channel that is mostly supported by contributions/donation from viewers. It is voluntary, and they have fund drives every few months inbetween shows. It is the only channel that has Britcoms like "Are you being served?" and "Keeping up appearances".

I had heard that in the UK you have a TV tax. How much does it cost a year to have a TV? And do they charge per set or by household?

Chris

rockbank
22-01-04, 10:43 AM
I had heard that in the UK you have a TV tax. How much does it cost a year to have a TV? And do they charge per set or by household?

We have a TV Licence which is about £115 a year. This pays for the BBC TV channels and the radio stations. Its cahrged per household so you pay the same regardless of how many TV's you have in your house

But then of course no TV is "free". If you're not paying a TV licence then the advertisers are merely putting the cost of their advertisements onto the products we are buying.

In the US the likes of ABC, NBC and CBS have admitted that their stations are merley their to have as many eyes as possible watching the advertisements. This is why if a show isn't an immediate ratings puler it gets cancelled. If Cheers was released today it wouldn't have lasted one season as it took a while to get a following and hence the show Frasier would never have existed. That's how stupid the whole thing is. I love america and its people but the TV is truly shockingly bad.

TooManyMoves
24-01-04, 06:21 AM
Thanks for the information Rockbank. You're right, the commercials are really irritating and often blatantly showing anti-social behavior and the quality of TV programming is horrible. I'd pay a certain amount of money not to watch commercials if the programming was interesting. The PBS channel I posted about doesn't have commercials. Lately what I have seen on commercial TV as a trend are pop-up advertising during a program.

I'm not sure if it is similar there.... but during what is suppose to be the important news minutes do they often devote half of it to celebrity news or sports stories?

Chris

Mistyeyeddreamer
24-01-04, 12:05 PM
but during what is suppose to be the important news minutes do they often devote half of it to celebrity news or sports stories?

We usually have the sports stories at the end of the news, unless of course England has won some cup or other than it's MAIN news :P You might guess I'm not a sports fan. Celebrity stories aren't all that big unless it's something like what's going on with Michael Jackson. We get lots of American stories but strangely very few European stories.

Misty