PDA

View Full Version : Children to be taught 'Britishness'


Planet 24
25-01-07, 02:20 PM
Schools in England should teach "core British values" alongside cultural diversity, a report says.

A review of how schools teach citizenship found there was not enough emphasis on UK identity and history.

The report, by Sir Keith Ajegbo, says pupils should study free speech, the rule of law, mutual tolerance and respect for equal rights.

Education Secretary Alan Johnson has said schools should "play a leading role in creating community cohesion".

Welcoming the report, Mr Johnson announced it would become compulsory for secondary school pupils up to the age of 16 to learn about shared values and life in the UK in their citizenship lessons.


He said youngsters should be encouraged to think critically about issues of race, ethnicity and religion with "an explicit link" to current political debates, the news and a sense of British values.

Understanding the make up of the UK and the recent history of Britain was crucial, he said.

Earlier, he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme how he defined "Britishness".

"It involves the values that we hold very dear in Britain which is free speech, which is tolerance, which is respect for the rule of law," he said.


The Ajegbo report says more could be done to ensure children "explore, discuss and debate their identities within their citizenship lessons".

Sir Keith, a former head teacher of a London school and Home Office adviser, concluded that pupils should be taught more about the history of Britain and about how British values of tolerance and respect developed.

He was asked to look at how the subject of "citizenship" was being taught in schools. It became compulsory in England's secondary schools in 2002. Primary schools are also expected to cover citizenship but it is not compulsory .

Sir Keith said: "Britain is committed to the values of free speech, the rule of law, mutual tolerance and respect for equal rights. They are things that are fundamental to our society."

He suggested that schools should be prepared to tackle controversial topics in the news such as the debate over immigration, and the UK's place in the European Union as well as the legacy of the British Empire.

He said: "It is the duty of all schools to address issues of `how we live together' and `dealing with difference', however difficult or controversial they may seem".


It makes no sense in our report to focus on minority ethnic pupils without trying to address and understand the issues for white pupils,
Where could pupils bring those difficult questions if not to school, he asked.

Sir Keith's report, which was commissioned by the government, also says more needs to be done to engage white, working-class pupils with the issue of diversity.

It says white pupils can feel disenfranchised as much as pupils from other ethnic backgrounds.

"Many indigenous white pupils have negative perceptions of their own identity," it says.

"It makes no sense in our report to focus on minority ethnic pupils without trying to address and understand the issues for white pupils. It is these white pupils whose attitudes are overwhelmingly important in creating community cohesion.

"Nor is there any advantage in creating confidence in minority ethnic pupils if it leaves white pupils feeling disenfranchised and resentful."


The new element for citizenship lessons will be called "Identity and Diversity: Living together in the UK" .

British history will be essential to it, said Sir Keith.

At the moment, history is optional after the age of 14. The historical lessons could include topics such as slavery, the British Empire and its legacy and the movement towards votes for all.


Mr Johnson said Britain was a nation built from and by people from other countries.

"I believe passionately that schools can and should play a leading role in creating greater community cohesion and combating ignorance of other countries, religions and cultures," he said.

"By 2010 one in five pupils in our schools will be from an ethnic minority - this is a challenge but also an opportunity to instil a culture of understanding and tolerance at an early age.

"The values our children learn at school will shape the kind of country Britain becomes."

The three existing planks of citizenship lessons are social and moral responsibility, communtiy involvement and political literacy.

Schools can give distinct lessons on the subject or introduce elements of it in various lessons. The report said it was best taught as a separate subject.

Sir Keith said citizenship lessons had been introduced as a response to political apathy but it was now time to broaden their remit.

Last year schools inspectors Ofsted said the subject was taught badly in one in four schools in England.


Source BBC news

spartacus73bc
25-01-07, 02:36 PM
What a load of garbage! We already teach citizenship in schools and it has made a fat lot of difference to behaviour or to manners in society as a whole.

As for the teaching of "Britishness", it's just another load of New Labour fatuousness. Ask Brown what constitutes "Britishness" and he'll reply that it comprises traits such as "fairness", "tolerance" ad infinitum. What? Would a Frenchman say any different? How is this exclusively British? How are we supposed to teach this trash? Are we teachers then to be held accountable for crime rates if they are not perceived to be falling sufficiently fast?

What an excellent way to shed the blame for declining civility and throw it, instead, on teachers. We all know that the real reason why people don't respect one another is because New Labour and all the other left-wing, PC, crones have destroyed respect for anything. Bad behaviour in schools is medicalised and teachers are neutered in their ability to enforce discipline. It's not the kids' fault, see!?

Crime must be due to poverty and we should learn to love the poor bairns better; rather than punish them for their sins. Role models are exposed as shams and sc*m is raised to the pedestal of celebrity. The gutter has come to power and money, or any other means of securing one's will, is the only barometer of social worth. If you can't buy it, steal it. If you can't discuss it, fight about it. There will always be a host of people who will give you "respect, innit" and a support group of cringing bed wetters who will act, with the authority of the state, to protect you from justice.

Jeez. Rant over....

Planet 24
25-01-07, 02:52 PM
Have to agree with everything you have said Spartacus and you said it with style :thumbs:

red2357
25-01-07, 03:35 PM
HEAR! HEAR! :yes:

I agree with Rowan (and spartacus73) 100%!!

Annabel
25-01-07, 03:45 PM
how about teaching kids about decency, manners and showing respect to one and another no matter was sex colour or creed. this is just basic standards of behaviour and not peculiar to being 'British'.

have to agree with you spartacus really, it is a load of tosh and I can just see how these lessons will end up, completely tied up in being politically correct and saying nothing of any value to the kids.

Planet 24
25-01-07, 05:55 PM
We are living in a country where people cannot look after their animals let alone their children, it's no good trying to teach kids new tricks when the parents are content to let sleeping dogs lie, while they go to the pub, party on or just look after number one and chuck the kids out all night. :badmood:

I am beginning to believe that there are some people who shouldn't be allowed to breed, because it would be safer for society and fairer on the offspring.

What kind of a life do some of these kids have anyway? :unsure:

There doesn't seem to be much kindness or good manners passed on that's for sure -probably a sign of weakness to do so :blink:

sesentayuno
26-01-07, 10:41 AM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(langwiz @ 25th January 2007 - 7:21 PM) 230743</div>While I was doing teaching practice in 1995, I witnessed a colleague's total unwillingness to accept that a young lad's behaviour was due to ADHD. I didn't say I knew the family. I knew it was genuine and that the mother had supported her son's survival of primary school. (Without the brain balancing medication he couldn't remember his thoughts through to the end of the sentence he was writing) Anyway thanks to the medication (he was one of the first in Devon to be recognised and treated when he was about 13) he is now a very successful young man.

Just had to point this out :notworthy: . </span></span></span>[/color][/size][/font][/b]

While I agree with what you have experienced and that there are examples where people did benefit from medical treatment, I cannot help but to think that many are abusing it and the above statement does have some weight to it. My friend was in behavioural support and now teaching for the past 5 years, she has seen too many bad behaviour, laziness and poor results being protected by terms like ADHD, Anger Management Issues, Dyslexia etc. Teachers are no longer there to teach, they are there to entertain, students are your customers, the whole education system is just wrong at the moment.

Ses

dozer
26-01-07, 11:11 AM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(sesentayuno @ 26th January 2007 - 9:40 AM) 230826</div>Teachers are no longer there to teach, they are there to entertain, students are your customers, the whole education system is just wrong at the moment.[/b]
But what should they teach, and why bother? The basic problem IMO is that the children and their parents can't see the point of school. All the proper jobs they could realistically have been expected to do have been swept up and shipped off to Guangdong Province, and they ain't coming back. Ever.
They can't all be human rights lawyers, personal trainers and Forex traders. And why should they?
So you're dead right, ses, but "what is to be done?" :(

c1rcle
26-01-07, 07:40 PM
Teachers should be teaching Reading, Writing & Maths for starters, if they want to teach religion they have to mention every religion not just the favourite minority of the month as goes on now & they absolutely need to teach ENGLISH History. Never mind about how the Americans won WWII for us or what the Russians got up to a thousand years ago teach the kids about their Heritage in this country.

I think it's disgraceful that 15% of teenagers think Winston Churchill is the nodding dog on those adverts, one of the greatest figures in this countries history from the last 100yrs & kids think he's a nodding dog.

I don't doubt that there are SOME kids with behavioural problems that need medical intervention, but there seems to me to be far too much of the "s/he's got medical problems" attitude about where a short sharp slap would probably sort them out much quicker than medication ever could.

sesentayuno
27-01-07, 12:48 AM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dozer @ 26th January 2007 - 10:11 AM) 230849</div>But what should they teach, and why bother? The basic problem IMO is that the children and their parents can't see the point of school. All the proper jobs they could realistically have been expected to do have been swept up and shipped off to Guangdong Province, and they ain't coming back. Ever.
They can't all be human rights lawyers, personal trainers and Forex traders. And why should they?
So you're dead right, ses, but "what is to be done?" :([/b]

Agree with c1rcle that the basics needs to be taught, primary and secondary schools are not there to teach you how to be an engineer, computer scientist, researcher, without the basic building blocks, one will struggle to re-train if their jobs were to be offshored. My job was shipped to Poland a few years ago, unfortunately for us, this is the way the job situation goes, the good old days of job for life is well and truly over. Therefore it is more important in this day of age to have strong basic skills in order to meet the challenge of globalisation.

Ses

rb2002
27-01-07, 10:14 AM
they absolutely need to teach ENGLISH History. Never mind about how the Americans won WWII for us or what the Russians got up to a thousand years ago teach the kids about their Heritage in this country.[/b]

However, the US war effort and Russian Revolutions did have a direct effect on BRITISH history. Up here we have to teach Scottish/British history and international situations.

As for teaching 'Britishness' that makes me very uncomfortable in a strange way. Are we to promote Britishness as superior to any other ethnicity in this diverse nation? Hmmmmm, where did they do that before?..... Ah yes, soviet Russia and Nazi Germany.

Years ago, before the governments started interfering so much, we were taught (and still are up here) Modern Studies which was about human/civil rights and democracy. Mix that with a good grounding in the chartists and suffragettes in history and we had a load of rampant politically minded kids who wanted to make the world better. Citizenship without the title.